Anna Bondar vs Darja Semenistaja Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Analyzing second serve performance in recent months, Bondar has demonstrated a superior ability by winning 43.04% of points on their second serve, compared to Semenistaja's 38.28%. This statistic is highly indicative of match outcomes. Additionally, when looking at return game stats, Bondar has captured 48.55% of their opponent's second serve points in recent form, whereas Semenistaja has a slight edge at 50.41%.

Delving deeper into return stats, Bondar has won 34.44% of points on first serve returns, while Semenistaja surpasses this with 36.5%. This data is instrumental in determining the favored player in head-to-head matchups. Under pressure, Bondar has a slight edge with a break point save percentage of 48.94% compared to Semenistaja's 46.21%, which is a critical factor for in-game betting decisions.

Reviewing performances over the past year, Bondar has emerged victorious in 56.76% of their matches (W/L 42/32), while Semenistaja follows closely behind with a 53.66% win rate (W/L 44/38). This performance overview helps form the basis for head-to-head predictions. On their preferred surface of clay, Bondar's winning percentage stands at 69% (W/L 309/140), slightly higher than Semenistaja’s 65% (W/L 116/62). However, Bondar struggles significantly on grass with a win percentage of 0% (W/L 0/6), unlike Semenistaja, whose least successful surface is indoor hard courts with a 25% win rate (W/L 3/9).

In examining the level of events both players participated in, Bondar has notably triumphed in 78.13% of matches at ITF tournaments over $10K (W/L 25/7), outpacing Semenistaja’s 58.82% (W/L 40/28). Analyzing opponent quality, Bondar has faced competitors with an average rank of 177.77, while Semenistaja’s opponents averaged a rank of 212.65.

In matches reaching deciding sets, stats show Semenistaja has a slight advantage, winning 59% of these encounters, as opposed to Bondar’s 57% over the past year. Furthermore, Bondar demonstrates a 35% breakpoint conversion in recent form, yet Semenistaja excels further with a conversion rate of 44.74%, revealing key insights for live betting scenarios when players have breakpoint opportunities.

Overall, examining all these statistics suggests that Bondar may have an edge with their superior second serve performance, and the quality of opposition faced. Nonetheless, considering Semenistaja’s better performance in breakpoint conversion and deciding sets, Semenistaja appears slightly more favored to claim victory in the upcoming match.